Category: tokenization

Austrian economics, Banking, Blockchains, Decentralized, Digital Currency, finance, palladium, precious-metals, tokenization, Uncategorized, Yogi Nelson

Tokenized Palladium: A Digital Asset for a High-Tech Age

Yogi Nelson

by Yogi Nelson

Every metal has a unique story. The story of gold is money. The silver story is about versatility, monetary and industrial. Platinum will eloquently explain its necessity in industrial processes. Palladium too has its story. Follow along and listen to palladium as it recites how its story is centered on technology, regulation, mother nature, and fragility.

It turns out few people outside mining, automotive engineering, or commodities trading think much about palladium. Why would they? Palladium is literally, an inside-the-machines story! Yet during the last 20 years, palladium often, albeit quietly, traded at prices higher than gold. Why? Was it monetary demand? No. Could tradition explain? No, try again. It’s because modern technology—and modern regulation—left the world with no easy substitute.

As blockchain technology matures and real-world asset tokenization expands beyond obvious candidates, palladium deserves a closer look, much closer. Again, not as a monetary metal, nor a general industrial metal, but as a high-tech constraint metal—one whose supply, demand, and price behavior reveal exactly why tokenization exists in the first place. Let’s not get ahead of the story. We need to start with the basics–what is palladium.

What Is Palladium?

Palladium is a silvery-white precious metal belonging to the platinum-group metals (PGMs), alongside platinum, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, and osmium. I call them the “UM” family! Palladium is chemically stable, highly catalytic, and resistant to corrosion—properties that make it ideal for industrial applications where efficiency matters and margins are thin. Do you see where this is going?

Unlike gold or silver, palladium has no historical monetary role. Discovered in 1803 by William Hyde Wollaston while refining platinum ore from South America, it never circulated as coinage or reserve money. Palladium’s value has always been functional. That distinction matters. Palladium is not concerned with narratives or sentimentality. Palladium say: physics and chemistry make me who I am.

What Is Palladium Used For?

The vast majority of palladium demand (approximately 80%) comes from one place: emissions control. Palladium is a critical component in catalytic converters for gasoline-powered vehicles, where it helps transform toxic exhaust gases into less harmful emissions. (Prior to catalytic converters palladium was used in: electronics, dentistry, medicine, chemical catalytics, jewelry as reflected below). As governments tightened emissions standards across North America, Europe, and Asia, palladium demand surged. Given the environmental damage caused by gasoline-powered vehicles, I say, hurray for palladium!

While emissions control dominate, there are other uses, including:

  • Electronics, particularly multilayer ceramic capacitors
  • Chemical processing and industrial catalysts
  • Dentistry and medical devices
  • Hydrogen purification and storage
  • Jewelry, a relatively minor use

Even so, palladium remains deeply tied to automotive production and environmental regulation. When gasoline vehicle demand rises, palladium demand follows. When supply tightens, due to geopolitical events or disruptions in the few productive mines, prices can move sharply. Electric vehicles (EVs) may pose a long-term threat to palladium demand. However, slower-than-expected EV adoption and stricter emission rules, along with rising hybrid vehicle sales, sustain significant demand for palladium.  In other words, palladium isn’t about to disappear any time soon.

Where Is Palladium Mined?

If scarcity gives metals value, concentration gives them risk. Palladium is no exception. Palladium production is extraordinarily concentrated. Roughly 80% of global supply comes from just two countries: Russia and South Africa. Russia alone accounts for a significant share of primary palladium production, largely as a byproduct of nickel and platinum mining. Given palladium is mined as a byproduct, production decisions are driven by nickel and platinum economics rather than palladium demand itself. This rigidity explains much of palladium’s historical volatility—and why transparency matters so deeply in this market.

Palladium as a byproduct creates several layers of vulnerability, including:

  • Geopolitical and sanctions risk
  • Supply-chain opacity
  • Limited ability to increase production quickly
  • Dependence on the economics of other metals

Palladium’s Price History: A Lesson in Constraint

Palladium prices can experience dramatic changes! Ups, downs, a real roller coaster. In fact, in the late 2010s, palladium prices surged well above gold, driven by tightening emissions standards, strong automotive demand, and constrained supply growth. At its peak, palladium traded at more than twice the price of gold—an almost unthinkable outcome for a metal few people could easily identify.

Then came gigantic price reversals. Technology shifted. Electric vehicles gained momentum. Recycling increased. Demand softened. Prices fell sharply. Volatility is not a flaw in the palladium market. It’s the defining feature. Now that we know what palladium is, how it’s used, where it comes from, we turn to the BIG question: why is palladium a tokenization candidate?

Why Palladium Is a Serious Tokenization Candidate

Let me answer the question directly with the following observations: tokenization works best where markets are opaque, fragmented, and slow to adapt. Palladium fits that description perfectly.

Transparency Where It Matters Most

Physical palladium inventories are difficult to track and often reported with delays. Tokenization allows specific, assayed, vaulted palladium to be represented on-chain, with ownership and inventory visible in near real time.

In a market where supply disruptions have immediate consequences, visibility is not a luxury—it is infrastructure.

Liquidity Without Distortion

Palladium markets are relatively small, and large trades can move prices. Tokenization enables fractional ownership and broader participation without forcing physical delivery or disrupting industrial supply chains. Tokenization is liquidity without leverage.

Faster Settlement in a Volatile Market

In fast-moving markets, slow settlement amplifies risk. Blockchain-based settlement reduces transaction times from days to minutes, limiting counterparty exposure during sharp price swings. For palladium, which is a relatively small market, this is especially important.

Tokenized Palladium vs Traditional Palladium Exposure

Today, palladium exposure typically comes through futures contracts, exchange-traded products, or mining equities. These instruments provide price exposure, but they remain abstractions layered atop clearinghouses, custodians, and jurisdictional complexity.

Tokenized palladium offers something different and more importantly, better:

  • Direct ownership of physical metal
  • On-chain auditability
  • Reduced reliance on intermediaries
  • Global accessibility without brokerage friction

Where traditional instruments offer price exposure, tokenization offers asset exposure. A critical distinction during periods of market stress.

Industrial and Supply-Chain Use Cases

Tokenized palladium is not primarily an investment concept. The strongest case for tokenized palladium falls to automotive manufacturers, chemical processors, and industrial users. Here is how they could use it:

  • Hedge raw-material costs directly
  • Maintain verified strategic inventories
  • Improve supply-chain traceability
  • Reduce settlement and financing friction

As ESG reporting and regulatory scrutiny increase, on-chain tracking of critical materials becomes a competitive advantage rather than a novelty.

Risks, Constraints, and Realism

Only two sure bets in life: death and taxes. Tokenized palladium is neither of those, therefore it is not risk-free. Below are four risks:

  • Demand is sensitive to technological shifts
  • Electric vehicle adoption introduces long-term uncertainty
  • Market size limits liquidity
  • Regulatory clarity remains uneven

Tokenization does not eliminate these risks–but it does force transparency. Ownership is explicit. Inventory is verifiable. Prices respond faster to reality. Markets become less forgiving—but more honest. A reasonable trade-off.

Long-Term Outlook: Palladium’s Digital Role

Will palladium become a household name? Don’t count on it. Besides, by its very nature, palladium doesn’t seek the spotlight; it does not aspire to monetary status or cultural symbolism. Palladium is the sensible sister, dedicated to solving technical problems efficiently and quietly. That makes palladium a strong representative of the next phase of tokenization.

As real-world asset tokenization matures, attention will shift from symbolic assets to functional ones. From narratives to necessities. From ideology to infrastructure. A tokenized future is one in which palladium belongs.

The facts all point in one direction: palladium is shaped by high-tech, regulation, and Mother Nature. In such a world, an asset that can be tokenized benefits immensely from transparency, speed, and verifiability–in other words, tokenization on the blockchain.

To conclude, tokenized palladium is not about hype. It is about alignment—between physical reality and digital systems.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

This post is part of an ongoing weekly series on the tokenization of precious metals, published on BlockchainAIForum and LinkedIn, examining custody, regulation, issuer structure, and settlement infrastructure.

Sources

World Platinum Investment Council (WPIC) – Palladium Market Reports
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) – Mineral Commodity Summaries: Palladium
International Energy Agency (IEA) – Emissions Standards and Technology Transition

Austrian economics, Banking, Blockchains, Decentralized, finance, International Finance, Mining, platinum, precious-metals, tokenization, Uncategorized

Tokenized Platinum: Built for the Real Economy

Yogi Nelson

by Yogi Nelson

Why Platinum Matters Now

Platinum has been tokenized, albeit in limited and experimental forms, since roughly 2019, but unlike gold and silver, it has yet to see a globally liquid, institutional-grade on-chain breakthrough—making it one of the most compelling “next metals” for tokenization. Of course, we already know tokenized gold first emerged in 2017, when blockchain technology was used for the first time to represent direct ownership of vaulted physical gold on-chain. What about silver? When was it first tokenized? Not surprisingly, after gold, in 2018. One year later came platinum.

Platinum does not rely on tradition, mythology, or monetary nostalgia to justify its relevance. If those factors don’t drive platinum, what does? Platinum matters because modern civilization cannot function without it. Platinum is a quiet essential metal. It is embedded in emissions systems, chemical processing, medical technology, and the emerging hydrogen economy.

Blockchain technology has moved beyond novelty to necessity. What’s more the evolution of blockchain is fantastic news for platinum. That means platinum enters the conversation at precisely the right moment—not as a store of ancient wealth, but as a critical industrial asset whose supply, custody, and pricing demand modernization. Although platinum is clearly different from gold and silver, that doesn’t mean tokenization is not viable, to the contrary. Despite the differences, the bull case for tokenized platinum is strong. Let’s start with a few fundamental differences between the metals.

What Makes Platinum Different

Platinum belongs to the platinum-group metals (PGMs), a family known for exceptional catalytic properties, heat resistance, and chemical stability. Keep those characteristics; they drive the demand for platinum.

Several characteristics distinguish platinum sharply from gold and silver:

  • Extreme scarcity: annual global platinum production averages under 200 metric tons. Annual production of gold is 3,000 metric tons, while silver is approximately 26,000 metric tons.
  • Geographic concentration: roughly three-quarters of supply comes from South Africa, with most of the remainder from Russia. Two nations rather than the 194 worldwide!
  • High production costs: platinum is difficult and expensive to extract and refine
  • Limited substitution: in many applications, platinum has no perfect replacement

These constraints make platinum uniquely sensitive to supply disruptions, geopolitical risk, and technological demand shifts. Tokenization does not change these fundamentals—but it makes them visible, auditable, and tradable in ways legacy markets struggle to achieve.

Monetary Metal or Industrial Metal? (The Platinum Distinction)

Gold is money, a store of wealth. Period. It is not currency. Silver is a combo platter. It straddles the line between money and industry. It has been, is, and will likely continue to be, money, a currency and industrial metal. Platinum, as with gold, has one primary use. But unlike gold, with its use as money, platinum is industrial, and industrial only. And what are those industrial applications? I’ll give you five:

  • Catalytic converters for emissions control
  • Chemical and petroleum refining
  • Medical devices and pharmaceuticals
  • Electronics and data storage
  • Hydrogen fuel cells and clean-energy systems

The upshot is platinum’s price behavior is driven less by investor sentiment and more by regulation, technological adoption, and industrial growth cycles. Tokenization allows markets to better reflect this reality—connecting industrial demand directly with transparent supply and ownership.

Why Platinum Is a Natural Fit for Tokenization

Tokenization solves certain problems and does so exceedingly well, under certain circumstances. Tokenized platinum just so happens to fit the bill. Consider the following:

Scarcity and Verifiability
Platinum bars are already standardized, serialized, and assayed. (Assayed means a metal that has been tested for purity, metal content, authenticity, and conformance to standards). This makes platinum bars ideal candidates for 1:1 on-chain representation backed by vaulted physical metal.

Liquidity Constraints
Platinum markets are tiny–much smaller than gold or silver. Tokenization enables fractional ownership, global access, and continuous trading without requiring physical delivery. Analogous to COMEX and LBMA markets, but with verified inventories!

Settlement Inefficiencies
Traditional platinum trades can involve long settlement cycles and counterparty risk. Blockchain settlement dramatically reduces settlement time to minutes or perhaps seconds, and significantly does away with counterparty risk.

Global Accessibility
Tokenized platinum can be accessed without brokerage accounts, national market hours, or legacy intermediaries. On-chain transaction tomorrow means, breaking the chains that limit markets today.

While all that is true, remember tokenization does not reinvent platinum—it modernizes access to it.

Tokenized Platinum vs. Traditional Platinum Products

Platinum exchange traded funds (ETFs) and futures contracts already exist. However, those financial products are abstractions layered atop complex custodial and regulatory structures. In 2026 and beyond, investors want what tokenization offers, specifically:

  • Direct ownership rather than synthetic exposure
  • On-chain transparency of reserves and transfers
  • Programmable compliance and auditability
  • Global reach independent of local financial infrastructure

Where ETFs represent claims, tokenized platinum represents digitally native possession backed by physical reality. This distinction mirrors the evolution seen in tokenized gold and silver—and completes the progression.

Real-World Use Cases Beyond Investment

Tokenized platinum’s utility extends well beyond speculation.

Industrial Hedging
Manufacturers can hedge platinum exposure directly on-chain, reducing reliance on opaque derivatives markets. What you see is what you get!

Supply-Chain Traceability
Blockchain tokens can track platinum from mine to refinery to end use, supporting ESG compliance and regulatory reporting. Platinum buyers can be sure of what is happening as it happens.

Corporate Treasury Assets
Energy, transportation, and clean-technology firms may hold tokenized platinum as a strategic reserve asset aligned with operational needs. For instance, a car manufacturer may want to buy platinum, put it in storage, and draw it down as needed and where needed, using the blockchain.

On-Chain Collateral
Platinum tokens can serve as collateral in decentralized finance systems, anchoring digital credit to physical industry. It’s unlikely a bank will offer a high debt to loan value if the collateral is platinum due to the limited number of potential buyers in case of a liquidation. Nevertheless, for a sophisticated lender, who understands the platinum market well the possibility exist.

This is where tokenization becomes infrastructure, not ideology.

Risks, Constraints, and Realism

Is tokenization risk-free. No way. Nothing is risk-free. In the case of platinum, below are some risk factors:

  • The market is smaller, increasing volatility
  • Custody standards must remain rigorous
  • Regulatory frameworks vary by jurisdiction
  • Adoption will be gradual rather than explosive

Tokenization does not eliminate these challenges—but it forces transparency, which is often the first step toward stability.

Long-Term Outlook: Platinum’s Quiet Permanence

Gold appeals to philosophy. When gold is strong, that often means geopolitical trouble is brewing. Silver is Mr. Versatility. He can be money. He can be industrial. He can be both. Platinum equals necessity. Platinum isn’t going to dominate headline news in the tokenized metals space—that is not a weakness.

As blockchain infrastructure matures and real-world asset tokenization becomes standard, platinum’s combination of scarcity, industrial indispensability, and constrained supply positions it as a permanent on-chain asset, not a speculative trend. Once tokenized properly, platinum is unlikely to leave the blockchain—because modern industry is unlikely to function without it.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Sources

World Platinum Investment Council (WPIC) – Platinum Quarterly Market Review
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) – Mineral Commodity Summaries: Platinum Group Metals
Johnson Matthey – Platinum Group Metals Market Report
International Energy Agency (IEA) – Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transitions
World Bank – Minerals for Climate Action

Austrian economics, Banking, Blockchains, cryptography, Digital Currency, finance, Mining, precious-metals, Silver, tokenization, Yogi Nelson

Tokenized Silver: Where Sound Money Meets Industrial Demand

Yogi Nelson

by Yogi Nelson

For hundreds of years, perhaps more, silver has lived in gold’s long shadow as a store of value. That’s why some folks call silver “poor man’s gold”. Silver stackers don’t mind being called “poor”. Lol! And yes, it’s true silver is more volatile than gold. And it’s also true silver has often been overlooked except during brief moments of speculative frenzy. Fine. But the question we face today is what will tokenized silver mean for utility, value, use, and price? Since tokenized silver is clearly a possibility, let’s explore all those questions and more. Remember, tokenized silver is not merely about price appreciation. It is about structure, accessibility, industrial relevance, and a monetary metal finally finding a digital form that suits its dual identity.

Silver’s Dual Personality: Money and Machine

Silver is unique among precious metals because it straddles two worlds. On one side, it is a monetary metal with thousands of years of history as coinage, savings, and settlement. On the other, it is an industrial metal embedded in the modern economy—electronics, solar panels, medical devices, electric vehicles, and advanced manufacturing all depend on it. A combo all investors love.

This dual role has long complicated silver’s investment narrative. Gold is a safe haven; it often thrives when fear rises and trust erodes. Silver responds to monetary stress, industrial cycles, technological adoption, and supply bottlenecks. The result is volatility—sometimes dramatic, sometimes punishing. For instance, in 1980 silver surged to $50 only to crash to $10 by 1982.

Yet that same complexity makes silver a natural candidate for tokenization. Does a blockchain ask whether an asset is “purely monetary” or “purely industrial?” Nope. Blockchains only ask whether ownership can be clearly defined, transparently recorded, and efficiently transferred. Silver checks every box. Read on, to understand why silver lagged gold in tokenization.

Why Silver Lagged Gold in Early Tokenization

Destiny ensured that gold was always going to be tokenization’s first success in the metals space. Central banks hold it. Vaulting standards are globally harmonized. The market is deep, liquid, and culturally entrenched. In other words, silver can’t compete with gold’s resume. Moreover, unlike gold, silver production is a by-product of other mining activities. While silver has a greater retail base, which means coins are preferred, industrial users care about delivery timing and purity specifications rather than symbolism.

Early tokenization projects prioritized simplicity and that gave gold the advantage. One token equals one ounce of vaulted gold, audited and insured. Silver’s logistical reality—greater bulk, higher storage costs per dollar of value, and more complex industrial flows—made it a less obvious starting point. But tokenization technology has matured. Smart contracts now accommodate fractional ownership, batch settlement, and multi-use claims. Custody providers have expanded their silver vaulting capabilities. What once looked like friction now looks like opportunity.

The Industrial Case for Tokenized Silver

Silver’s industrial demand is no longer a footnote; it is the headline. Solar energy alone consumes a meaningful and growing share of global silver supply. Each photovoltaic panel requires silver paste for conductivity. As nations push for electrification, grid upgrades, and renewable deployment, silver demand becomes structural rather than cyclical. It may sound unbelievable, but true–there are hundreds of millions of people around the world without reliable electricity. They want it, and silver is required.

Tokenization introduces a powerful new mechanism here. Industrial users can hedge future silver needs using tokenized inventory. Manufacturers can settle supply contracts on-chain. Producers can tokenize output before it leaves the ground, creating pre-financing structures that reduce reliance on debt.

This is where silver begins to differentiate itself from gold in the RWA universe. Gold is stored. Detractors say it only collects dust. Silver is used. Tokenization allows the same ounce to move fluidly between investment, collateral, and consumption states without leaving the digital ledger.

Accessibility: Silver’s Hidden Advantage

Gold’s price per ounce (about $4,400) is both a strength and a barrier. It conveys seriousness, but limits participation to the wealthy. Silver’s lower unit cost makes it inherently more accessible to the 99%—especially when paired with fractionalized tokens.

For younger investors, emerging-market savers, and on-chain participants accustomed to granular positions, tokenized silver feels intuitive. It aligns with the ethos of decentralized finance: small units, high velocity, global reach. This accessibility matters. Tokenization is not only about efficiency; it’s also about democratization. Silver has always been the people’s metal. Tokenization creates a 21st century distribution channel to the natural union of silver and blockchain.

Trust, Custody, and the Importance of Standards

Let’s be honest, no discussion of tokenized metals is complete without addressing trust. The promise of tokenization collapses if the underlying metal is not real, allocated, and verifiable. Tokenization adheres to the old Russian proverb: trust but verify.

Silver investors, perhaps more than gold investors, are acutely aware of paper claims, re-hypothecation, and opaque inventories. Are the Commodities Exchange (COMEX) and the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) trustworthy institutions? Silver investors wary; hence, they will gravitate to a technology based on zero trust where independent audits, clear redemption rights, and transparent reporting are transparent and the industry standards. Tokenization embeds the standards into code. This is big!

Here is the takeaway: The winners in this space will be those who understand that blockchain is a trust amplifier, not a trust substitute.

Monetary Reset Narratives and Silver’s Optionality

Plain and simple, gold dominates conversations about monetary reset, de-dollarization, and central-bank accumulation. Silver is rarely mentioned in the same breath, yet history tells a more nuanced story. For centuries, silver was money—not a derivative of gold, but a parallel standard. In fact, in the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, says: “No State shall … make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts.” That was then what about now? India, the world’s most populous nation, has announced its bank can accept silver as collateral. Some things never go out of fashion!

In a world where sovereign currencies face structural debt burdens and confidence erosion, silver’s optionality becomes valuable. It offers monetary exposure with embedded industrial demand. Tokenization enhances this optionality by making silver portable, programmable, and interoperable with digital financial systems.

If gold is the anchor, silver may be the bridge.

Silver vs. Gold Tokens: Complement, Not Competition

It is tempting to frame tokenized silver as a challenger to tokenized gold. That framing misses the point. These assets serve different functions within a tokenized portfolio.

Gold tokens excel as long-term reserves, collateral for large settlements, and institutional balance-sheet assets. Silver tokens shine in liquidity, payments experimentation, industrial hedging, and retail participation. Together, they form a digital precious-metals stack that mirrors their historical relationship—distinct, complementary, and mutually reinforcing.

In this sense, silver’s underdog status becomes an advantage. It is not burdened by expectations of perfection. It is free to innovate, and innovators change the world.

Risks and Realism

No asset story is complete without acknowledging risk. Silver remains volatile. Industrial demand can fluctuate. Tokenization introduces regulatory complexity, especially across jurisdictions. Custody failures or poorly designed token structures could undermine confidence.

Moreover, tokenized silver must avoid the trap of becoming merely “paper silver on a blockchain.” Without clear redemption mechanisms and enforceable legal claims, digital representations add little value. Yet these risks are not unique to silver. They are the growing pains of an emerging asset class. What matters is design discipline.

Conclusion

Is 2026 the year tokenized silver breaks out? I conclude yes, because of three powerful forces: 1) the long-term digitization of assets trend; 2) will electrification of the global economy march forward; 3) and the search for trustworthy stores of value outside fragile monetary systems. If those powerful forces occur, tokenized silver begins in 2026.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

*** This article is part of an ongoing weekly series examining the tokenization of precious metals—covering custody, standards, regulation, issuer structure, settlement infrastructure, and market design. The series is published on BlockchainAIForum and LinkedIn and is among the few sustained, multi-metal editorial projects focused on tokenized metals as financial infrastructure rather than product promotion.

Banking, Blockchains, Decentralized, Digital Currency, finance, Gold, International Finance, precious-metals, tokenization, Yogi Nelson

Why Tokenized Gold is Becoming the Standard for Hard Assets

Yogi Nelson

by Yogi Nelson

Tokenized gold is not about changing gold.
It is about changing how we own, transfer, and verify it.

For thousands of years, gold has endured because it combines scarcity, durability, and universal recognition. Those properties will not change in 2026 or beyond. What is changing is the infrastructure around gold.

Platforms such as T-Gold and Paxos Gold (PAXG) show how fully backed physical gold can now be represented digitally—without turning it into paper promises or abstractions. The gold remains vaulted and insured. Ownership moves digitally.

This is not a revolution. It is an upgrade.

Tokenization separates custody from ownership transfer, reducing friction while preserving asset integrity. That is why gold is emerging as the benchmark for real-world asset tokenization—and why institutions are paying attention.

Gold remains gold. What changes is how efficiently it can participate in a digital financial system.

This is an abbreviated version of this article. For the complete article, or previous articles in this series visit my blog at:  https://yogapuertorico.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=2537&action=edit

This article is part of an ongoing weekly series examining the tokenization of precious metals—covering custody, standards, regulation, issuer structure, settlement infrastructure, and market design. The series is published on BlockchainAIForum and LinkedIn and is among the few sustained, multi-metal editorial projects focused on tokenized metals as financial infrastructure rather than product promotion.

Austrian economics, Banking, Blockchains, cryptography, Decentralized, Digital Currency, Gold, International Finance, Mining, precious-metals, Silver, Tether, tokenization, Uncategorized

Why Tokenized Gold is Becoming the Standard for Hard Assets

Yogi Nelson

by Yogi Nelson

Dating back thousands of years, well before the ancient Roman Empire, gold has maintained its role as a store of value. That’s impressive. That begs the question: what properties does gold have that allow it to endure while paper money always fails? The answer is—gold combines scarcity, durability, and universal recognition.

In 2026, and beyond, gold’s properties won’t change—of that I am sure. Nevertheless, major change is afoot—of that I am sure also. Am I contradicting myself? Not at all. The evolution of gold in 2026, and beyond, will be the manner and infrastructure used to own, transfer, and verify it—of that I am confident also.

As discussed in Week One, tokenization does not alter the nature of an asset—it changes how ownership is represented and transferred. It’s an update, not a revolution. In other words, tokenized gold applies all the same properties to fully backed physical gold, allowing it to function within modern digital financial systems without losing its physical foundation.

Tokenized Gold in Practice: T-Gold

Tokenized gold is no longer theoretical. Platforms such as T-Gold (by Peter Schiff) illustrate how this model works in practice. T-Gold uses blockchain technology (Ethereum) to digitally represent ownership of fully allocated physical gold.

On T-Gold, a client can purchase tokenized gold through the digital platform. Each token represents a defined quantity of physical, investment-grade gold held in professional, insured vaults. The gold remains stationary; ownership changes are recorded digitally. This distinction mirrors a core theme from Week One: custody and ownership do not need to move together. The token is not a derivative or a paper promise. It represents ownership of allocated gold, expressed through a digital record.

In practical terms, T-Gold allows clients to:

  • Acquire physical gold without handling or transport
  • Hold gold in divisible digital units
  • Transfer ownership efficiently
  • Retain the option of physical redemption, subject to platform terms

The result is gold ownership that combines physical backing with digital efficiency. Point on the scoreboard!

A Second Reference Point: Paxos Gold (PAXG)

Paxos Gold (PAXG) provides a second, widely recognized example of institutional-grade tokenized gold. Paxos decided to go with the most used layer one blockchain—Ethereum.

Each PAXG token represents one fine troy ounce of gold, allocated to specific London Good Delivery bars stored in LBMA-approved vaults. Token holders can verify the serial numbers of the bars backing their tokens and, under defined conditions, redeem tokens for physical metal. Trust and verify!

As outlined in Week One, transparency and auditability are non-negotiable requirements for credible real-world asset tokenization. PAXG demonstrates how those requirements are implemented in practice through allocation, reporting, and regulated custody.

Why Traditional Gold Ownership Is Operationally Limited

Physical gold ownership is risky. With physical ownership, a multitude of weak points are introduced. For example, you could have disasters in storage, insurance, security, and transport. That’s why I can’t imagine storing gold at home.

Paper gold products, on the other hand, reduce some frictions—but at what costs? With paper you have counterparty risk, opacity, and a lack of direct claims on specific bars.

Is there a solution to the dilemma? Yes, tokenization.

Why Blockchain Fits Gold

Tokenization, as framed in Week One, separates physical custody from ownership transfer. Gold remains physical; ownership becomes digital. This separation reduces friction without weakening asset integrity. A perfect solution. Moreover, blockchain systems provide verifiable ownership records, fine-grained divisibility, near-instant settlement, and cross-border transferability. These characteristics align closely with the functional goals described in Week One for modernizing hard assets without financial abstraction.

Applied to gold, blockchain improves how ownership is recorded and transferred—nothing more, and nothing less, at a reasonable price. Winner!

Why Gold Leads Tokenized Hard Assets

Gold is emerging as the lead tokenized hard asset. It’s not hard to understand why if you consider what I explained in Week One—gold has global acceptance, deep liquidity, high value density, mature custody infrastructure, and established legal treatment. T-Gold and Paxos Gold demonstrate the broader principle: blockchain can enhance hard assets without turning them into abstractions.

Could others follow? Sure. Over the course of 2026, I will cover the other possible candidates, including silver, copper, or farmland. Gold, rightly, is the pioneer—but others will most likely trail not far behind.

Is Big Money Open to Tokenization

BlackRock Asset Management and Franklin Templeton are tokenizing financial assets in record volume. In fact, BlackRock CEO, Larry Fink, has spoken openly about the tokenization of all assets. Therefore, why doubt that tokenization of gold is not inevitable? Already, we see tokenized gold is increasingly used within institutional and regulated environments, including digital custody platforms, on-chain settlement systems, collateral frameworks, and portfolio allocation tools. Basically, tokenization is evolving as infrastructure, not disruption. Tokenized gold improves efficiency while remaining compatible with existing financial systems. Great combo!

Due Diligence Never Goes Out of Style

Tokenization does not eliminate risk. Custodian quality, vault jurisdiction, audit transparency, legal enforceability of redemption rights, and blockchain governance all remain critical considerations. These risks align with the asset-layer framework introduced in Week One: weaknesses in the physical, legal, or digital layer undermine the entire structure.

Conclusion

As this series continues, the same framework introduced in Week One, and reinforced here in Week Two, will be applied to silver, copper, and other metals. However, I started with gold as it remains the benchmark—the asset that shows how traditional value can function in a digital system. Gold remains unchanged. What changes is how ownership is recorded and transferred. Technology enhances asset clarity, a necessity in today’s world!

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Selected Sources

This article is part of an ongoing weekly series examining the tokenization of precious metals—covering custody, standards, regulation, issuer structure, settlement infrastructure, and market design. The series is published on BlockchainAIForum and LinkedIn and is among the few sustained, multi-metal editorial projects focused on tokenized metals as financial infrastructure rather than product promotion.