Tag: Yogi Nelson

Uncategorized

ChatGPT VERSUS BARD, WHO WINS THE FIGHT?

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where your technology questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question, comes from Ming (Netherlands) and he wants to know who wins in a fight, ChatGPT or Bard?

Ming, you are in the right place. As implied in your question, and acknowledged by both parties, ChatGPT and Bard are direct competitors. Let’s put these pugilists into the ring and give each an identical test to determine the peoples’ champ. Holy AI boxing match, Batman! We commence by identifying the warriors, starting with ChatGPT.

In the blue corner is ChatGPT, a product of OpenAI. OpenAI is a California based software company developing artificial intelligence. OpenAI describes ChatGPT as a language model designed to understand and generate human like text based on the input it receives. ChatGPT is now in version 4 and uses GPT3.5 as its underlying technology.

In the red corner is Bard, a product of Google, and Google needs no introduction. Bard is a conversational AI tool that uses Gemini as its underlying technology. Bard allows users to interact with and use chat-like dialogues to ask questions, receive information, and complete tasks.

The warriors are in the ring and ready to rumble! Let’s ask five questions across a range of topics:

  1. Can you write a 300-word essay describing the four voyages of Christopher Columbus?
  2. Please give me five Chinese recipes for tofu.
  3. Why did the USA boycott the 1980 Olympics in Moscow?
  4. Can you write a 300-word essay describing the Federal Reserve Banking system?
  5. Explain the physics in aviation that facilitates flight in 300 words.

Round 1: ChatGPT wins by technical disqualification. Although both answered the question fundamentally correct, Bard did not follow instructions. I asked for a 300-word answer. Bard used 370 and ChatGPT 292.

Round 2: ChatGPT wins by technical disqualification because Bard failed to follow instructions. I asked for five recipes; Bard provided four. However, Bard did land punches. For example, it added pictures of every final dish; ChatGPT did not. That’s a big plus. ChatGPT gave me the name of the dishes in Chinese characters; Bard did not. However, given I don’t understand Chinese written characters including them was not value added.

Round 3: Bard wins by adding additional links to the story and including an explanation of what happen after the 1980 boycott. Bard offered links to U.S. State Department documents, a photo, and noted the Soviet Union retaliated in 1984 when it and its allies boycotted the Olympic games held in the USA. Impressive!

Round 4: Bard wins. Great answers were given by both competitors, however, Bard wins the round in a close decision. Bard wins, not due to substance; it wins on style points. Essentially, Bard presented the answer in a format that was superior. Bard made ample use of bullet points and subsections with titles thus making it easier for the reader to follow-along.

After four rounds we are tied. The tension mounts! The winner of round five takes home the championship belt! Hold on to your keyboard!

Round 5: In dramatic fashion ChatGPT takes round five and the title! Although Bard’s format was easier to read, ChatGPT wins using substance. ChatGPT cited two authoritative sources of information and that made the difference.

Ming, I hope you enjoyed the battle of the bots. Today’s proverb comes from Netherlands, where they say, He’s standing there with his mouth full of teeth. (He is speechless).

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Uncategorized

WHAT DID VITALIK BUTERIN RECENTLY SAY ABOUT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question comes from Art in San Francisco, CA. Art asks what does Vitalik Buterin think of artificial intelligence?

Art, you came to the right place. Before I explain Vitalik’s thoughts, let’s know Buterin first. Vitalik is a 29-year-old Russian Canadian computer programmer and a co-founder of Ethereum. Ethereum is a decentralized blockchain network, known for pioneering smart contracts, among other advancements in computation. From an early age Vitalik demonstrated an amazing ability to grasp mathematics and computer science. That’s not a surprise given his father was a computer scientist. Holy, like father, like son, Batman! Given his genius with computers, it makes sense you would ask what Vitalik makes of AI.

On November 23, Vitalik published his “My Techno Optimism” paper.
https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/11/27/techno_optimism.html?ref=bankless.ghost.io Vitalik’s summary perspective is below followed by highlights from across the major points of his paper.

“I believe in a future that is vastly brighter than the present thanks to radically transformative technology, and I believe in humans and humanity. I reject the mentality that the best we should try to do is to keep the world roughly the same as today but with less greed and more public healthcare. However, I think that not just magnitude but also direction matters. There are certain types of technology that much more reliably make the world better than other types of technology. There are certain types of technology that could, if developed, mitigate the negative impacts of other types of technology. The world over-indexes on some directions of tech development, and under-indexes on others. We need active human intention to choose the directions that we want, as the formula of “maximize profit” will not arrive at them automatically.”

Vitalik Buterin, My Techno-Optisium

Buterin argues there are very high costs to delaying technological progress. He cites life expectancy improvements and the internet, as evidence for not holding back technological advancements. Vitalik makes the case for using advancements in AI to solve environmental challenges, including climate change.

Vitalik believes AI is fundamentally different from previous advancements in technology and therefore requires significantly more consideration. Vitalik says AI is the creation of a new and powerful brain whereas previous inventions were contraptions. “AI is a new type of mind that is rapidly gaining in intelligence, and it stands a serious chance of overtaking humans’ mental faculties and becoming the new apex species on the planet”, says Buterin. Vitalik cites scientists that are worried AI could wipe out humanity! Holy doomsday, Batman!

Buterin, is equally concerned with “digital authoritarianism”. Vitalik points out Open AI, with a mere 500 employees, services 100,000,000 customers with immensely powerful machines! Power could be centralized by just a handful of people one day, is Vitalik’s worry.

Vitalik pens a lengthy narrative regarding the e/acc movement. According to Vitalik, e/acc is “… fundamentally about an appreciation of the truly massive benefits of technological progress, and a desire to accelerate this trend to bring those benefits sooner.” Jeff Bezos is the most prominent advocate. In a point-by-point fashion, Buterin shares what he believes are the implications of e/acc across a range of topics, including: military technology, decentralized governance, cyber security, multi-planetary living, world government, to name a few topics.

We conclude today with this proverb from the Dominican Republic: With patience and calm, a donkey can climb a palm tree. Well said my Caribbean brethren!

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Uncategorized

WHAT MONETARY SYSTEM DOES THE CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN USE?

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where your questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question is from Bhante Chandra from Kandy, Sri Lanka, and he wants to know what monetary system does the Cardano Blockchain use?

Bhante, you came to the right place. Let’s start first with explaining Cardano. Cardano is a decentralized, open source blockchain network that burst onto the scene in 2017. Charles Hoskinson, Cardano’s founder, created Cardano as a third generation blockchain. Bitcoin and Ethereum were generations one and two, respectively. Of course, Bitcoin was released by an anonymous developer (Satoshi Nakamura) in 2008, and Ethereum by a team, including Hoskinson, in 2015.

Cardano is recognized for its research-based approach. Cardano technology is based on nearly 200 peer reviewed academic research reports. Critics say Cardano is slow to the market; Cardano proponents acknowledge the critique. However, Cardano advocates say they are oven cooking not microwaving. Fair point! First and second generation blockchains were energy gluttons because they were constructed with proof of work consensus systems; Cardano was built using a proof of stake consensus system making it extremely energy efficient. Love a green blockchain!

Cardano is focused on solving the blockchain trilemma problem of balancing speed, scalability, and security. Essentially, the trilemma problem in blockchain says the more one or two issues are solved the worse off are the remaining. Holy no way out, Batman! Cardano also is recognized for its smart contract capabilities. Smart contracts facilitate the transfer of value from peer to peer without intermediaries. Now about the monetary system.

The Cardano network uses crypto currency to pay for transactions. Cardano currency is known as ADA, named after the famous British female mathematician and computer programmer, Ada Lovelace. Smaller denominations of ADAs are called Lovelace and they go out six decimal places, .000006. Bust out the calculator!

Cardano began with a total supply of 45B ADA. However, not all were release upon inception; that would be irresponsible. Instead, Cardano has phased in ADA distribution. Cardano is de-inflationary by design, meaning the supply of ADA decreases with time.

Let’s talk about the Cardano treasury and your personal Cardano treasury. Cardano’s treasury has three revenue sources: minting; donations; and taxation from block rewards. Great! Now, how does an individual grow their personal Cardano treasury? Here too there are multiple avenues. You could, for example, purchase ADA on an exchange, such as Coinbase. Suppose you purchased ADA, what next? Well, you could earn additional ADA by “staking it”. Staking is blockchain/crypto jargon for earning rewards. Think of it as interest payments for locking up and “lending” your ADA. Or you can operate your own stake pool and earn ADA directly. Operating a skating pool requires technical computer skills; learn and earn!

Once you have a bag of ADA, where to keep the stash is the question. Here again you have options. You can store your ADA on a centralized exchange, e.g., Coinbase. There are pros and cons to centralized exchanges, that go beyond this post. Or you can self-custody your stack; that too comes with advantages and disadvantages. Several self-custody wallets are available, including Typhon Wallet, Flint Wallet, or Yoroi Wallet.

A special thanks to Cardano and Emurgo Academy for supplying the information for today’s post. Time to go, but not before sharing an Egyptian proverb: “You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell a man is wise by his questions.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Uncategorized

WHAT IS THE TURING TEST?

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where your questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question, comes from Tiago, in Sao Paulo, and he wants to know what is the Turing test?

Tiago, you came to the right place. Before describing and explaining the test, let’s understand who was Alan Turing? Turing was a British mathematician and computer scientist. The Big Papi of computer science! In 1936 Mr. Turing published “On Computable Numbers”. His research paper laid down the core concepts of a computer 10 years before the computer was invented! The machine became known as the Turing Machine. Turing went further and published “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, in 1950. Here is the link: https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/LIX/236/433/986238 Turing’s research was focused on machine intelligence–can machines think. No easy task and begs the questions, how to determine and measure whether a machine is intelligent. Turing’s solution, known today as the Turing Test, was to modify a popular game at the time known as the “imitation game”.

The game works as follows: a computer and a human receive typed questions from a human judge called the interrogator. If the interrogator cannot accurately identify the answers of the computer, the computer wins. According to Turing, if the computer wins, we cannot say it’s unintelligent thus it must have some degree of intelligence. Given Turing defined thinking as the ability to solve problems, a computer could therefore develop intelligence. Turing anticipated his critics and refuted their nine most probable and powerful arguments, which I summarize below.

Turing starts with and destroys theological objections, citing bible passages where the earth revolves around the Sun and resulting Galileo situation. He moves to objection two labeled “head in the sand”. According to Turing, this position stems from humans unwilling to consider losing intellectual supremacy. The third objection is mathematical, and in full disclosure I did not completely understand. However, I did understand Turing said man can be smarter than a machine but cannot be smarter than every machine. Let’s turn to objection 4, consciousness.

Turing readily admits the consciousness is mysterious. Nevertheless, he says “I do not think these mysteries necessarily need to be solved before we can answer the question with which we are concerned in this paper.” In other words, we don’t need to know it all to know some of it. Objection five relates to “various disabilities”. By disabilities Turing means machines are limited to narrow tasks. I’ll quote Turing’s rebuttal, “… the criticism that a machine cannot have much diversity of behavior, is just a way of saying that it does not have much storage capacity.” Fair point in 1950.

Critics say computer are incapable of surprises and thus don’t think. I’ll paraphrase Turing’s answer: “… this assumes that as soon as a fact is presented the mind fully comprehends all the consequences. While that may be a useful assumption, and sometimes correct, it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is one assumes there is no virtue in the working out consequences from data and general principles. In other words, a machine can surprise you if you give it a chance.

Continuity in the nervous system is objection seven. Turing acknowledged differences in the nervous systems between a discrete state machine (computer) and continuous machines (humans). However, for the Turing test the differences do not affect the interrogator in either direction, says Turing; hence, irrelevant.

The informality of behavior is objection eight. Critics point out humans don’t need rules for every conceivable situation whereas computers do. Turing counters by claiming computer could reach similar status given enough time and computing power. He gives a small example of what had been achieved using what was available at the time.

We conclude with objection nine, extra sensory perception, which Turing defined as telepathy, clairvoyance, pre-cognition, and psychokinesis. Turing had a somewhat dismissive rebuttal–put all Turing test participants into telepathy-proof rooms. Lol!

We reached the end with a proverb from Brazil, “Never poke a jaguar with a short stick”.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Uncategorized

WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF BLOCKCHAIN?

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where your questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question comes from Ashley in Texas, who wants to know, what is the future of blockchain?

Ashley, you came to the right place. Blockchain technology has enormous potential; however, it must conquer immediate challenges. Let’s begin with five challenges facing blockchain technology today: 1) scalability; 2) initial set-up costs; 3) smooth transition; 4) consensus mechanisms; and 5) privacy and security. I’ll focus on a few solutions, commencing with “sharding”

Sharding is a process for handling large data sets. Sharding accelerates processing by dividing the computational workload and storage space issues. It ensures no single mode (computer) is responsible for processing the network’s transactional load. Sharding increases security through transparent processing on a decentralized network. Sharding is not alone; it has a friend known as sidechains; not to be confused with 2Chainz the rapper! Lol.

Sidechains are separate blockchains attached to the mainchain. Often, sidechains are deployed to test new software before joining the mainchain. Sidechains offer more security when moving digital assets from one blockchain to another and reduce the mainchain’s workload; hence, making the blockchain faster and more reliable. What else is under construction? Answer—state channels.

Despite their Orwellian name, state channels are not spooky. State channels basically “lock” the blockchain while participants agree amongst themselves off-chain. Once participants reach consensus the transaction is uploaded onto the mainchain for processing. Let’s keep rolling with “Roll-Ups”.

Rollups are scaling solutions. Roll-ups move computation off-chain while keeping transaction data on-chain. Keeping the data on-chain allows anyone to locally process all computation in the roll-up and detect fraud. There are two types of roll-ups: Optimistic and ZK. Optimistic roll-ups assume the data/transactions are correct. However, to ensure accuracy, transactions are not final for one week. During the data verification week anyone may submit fraud proof. If no honest individual spots an error, transactions are final. If errors are spotted the transactions can be reversed. What about ZK-Rollups? ZK-Rollups stands for zero knowledge. No, it does not mean the protocol is a know nothing, lol! It means every rollup batch contains a cryptographic hash, thus making transaction more secure. In other words, possession of the private key opens the file and nothing else is required. However, with the increase in security also comes computationally intensive processes. Time, money, and energy consumption.

Charles Hoskinson, Cardano founder, is fond of saying blockchains need their “wi-fi” moment. Said differently, blockchains must achieve interoperability. Imagine having to switch providers every moment to access wi-fi. What a mess! Blockchain interoperability equals users having a seamless integration of capabilities, communication with and between intermediaries, and greater decentralization. Get it done!

Let’s wrap it up with Ricardian contracts. A Ricardian contract is a mechanism to record a document as law and link it to other sectors, i.e., accounting. A Ricardian contract is responsible for executing contracts between two parties and recording the details in forms that are readable by humans and machines. Moreover, the dual abilities of Ricardian contracts equal superior user experiences when compared to smart contracts. Holy dual use!

Today’s “proverb” is curtesy of Yogi Berra to old time baseball star who once said, “it’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future”! lol. Nevertheless, I predict blockchain will evolve and eventually become mainstream technology with widespread applications. Thanks to the Emurgo Academy for providing the source material of today’s post. The art work is by Gerardo Cloquell and on display in Dorado, PR.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson