Tag: CHATGPT

Artificial Intelligence, Yogi Nelson

WHAT IS THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALLIANCE?

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where your technology questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question comes from Butch, in Arkansas, USA. Butch wants to know, what is the Artificial Intelligence Alliance?

Butch, you came to the right place. The Artificial Intelligence Alliance (AI Alliance) is an organization with an impressive membership roster. The AI Alliance consists of technology creators, developers and adopters collaborating to advance safe, responsible AI rooted in open innovation, according to their official statement. Who are the members? Click the link here: https://thealliance.ai/

AI Alliance membership is diverse and as expected concentrated in the tech sector. There are numerous prestigious universities, including U.C. Berkeley, Dartmouth, and the University of Texas. Moreover, the AI Alliance includes foreign universities in Japan and one in Dubai, exclusively for AI. Holy, big brain, Batman! Not surprisingly AI Alliance members are generally from the business community. For example, you will find Meta, Intel, IBM, Oracle, and many other household corporate names.

What does the AI Alliance do? The AI Alliance has three focus areas. Let’s take one at a time.

Responsible and Scalable AI. AI Alliance has set a goal of creating benchmarks, tools, and methodologies to ensure and evaluate high-quality and safe AI. The AI Alliance will also be an advocate for AI safety and security.

Open Foundation Models. The AI Alliance says it will focus on responsibly advancing the ecosystem of open foundation models with diverse modalities, including highly capable multilingual, multi-modal, and science models that can help address society-wide challenges in climate, education, and beyond.

Diverse AI Hardware. AI Alliance claims its members will collaborate on the benchmarking, optimization, and adaptation of AI workloads to advance a diverse set of hardware. AI Alliance reports it will focus on scalability, platform adaptation, and advanced power, energy, and carbon modeling. Benchmarks and metrics developed for model inference, fine-tuning and energy consumption of large-scale AI workloads will also be contributed to the open-source community.

Butch, you ask in what way do the members contribute? I’ll give you three of the eight ways AI Alliance members can contribute. We start with a pledge to deploy benchmarks, tools, and other resources that enable the responsible development and use of AI systems at global scale, including the creation of a catalog of vetted safety, security, and trust tools. Second AI Alliance members agree to responsibly advance the ecosystem of open foundation models with diverse modalities, including highly capable multilingual, multi-modal, and science models that can help address society-wide challenges in climate, human health, and beyond. And third, AI Alliance members say they will support global AI skills building, education, and exploratory research. Nothing short of ambitious!

The actual working of the AI Alliance is fascinating and deserves a short explanation. The AI Alliance will divide the work and its members into groups with specific tasks. To direct the work, the AI Alliance announced it will establish a governing board and technical oversight committee. The board and technical committee will establish overall project standards and guidelines. There is no mention of an Executive Director, dedicated staff, nor explicit political activities, yet. However, I am confident the AI Alliance will eventually establish a Washington, D.C. presence to lobby the executive branch, Congress, and regulators. That’s how it works, folks!

Butch, I hope I answered your question. Remember what they say in Italy: When you finish the game, the king and pawn end up in the same box.

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson

Uncategorized

ChatGPT VERSUS BARD, WHO WINS THE FIGHT?

Yogi Nelson

Namaste Yogis. Welcome to the Blockchain & AI Forum, where your technology questions are answered, mostly correct! Here no question is too mundane. As a bonus, a proverb is also included. Today’s question, comes from Ming (Netherlands) and he wants to know who wins in a fight, ChatGPT or Bard?

Ming, you are in the right place. As implied in your question, and acknowledged by both parties, ChatGPT and Bard are direct competitors. Let’s put these pugilists into the ring and give each an identical test to determine the peoples’ champ. Holy AI boxing match, Batman! We commence by identifying the warriors, starting with ChatGPT.

In the blue corner is ChatGPT, a product of OpenAI. OpenAI is a California based software company developing artificial intelligence. OpenAI describes ChatGPT as a language model designed to understand and generate human like text based on the input it receives. ChatGPT is now in version 4 and uses GPT3.5 as its underlying technology.

In the red corner is Bard, a product of Google, and Google needs no introduction. Bard is a conversational AI tool that uses Gemini as its underlying technology. Bard allows users to interact with and use chat-like dialogues to ask questions, receive information, and complete tasks.

The warriors are in the ring and ready to rumble! Let’s ask five questions across a range of topics:

  1. Can you write a 300-word essay describing the four voyages of Christopher Columbus?
  2. Please give me five Chinese recipes for tofu.
  3. Why did the USA boycott the 1980 Olympics in Moscow?
  4. Can you write a 300-word essay describing the Federal Reserve Banking system?
  5. Explain the physics in aviation that facilitates flight in 300 words.

Round 1: ChatGPT wins by technical disqualification. Although both answered the question fundamentally correct, Bard did not follow instructions. I asked for a 300-word answer. Bard used 370 and ChatGPT 292.

Round 2: ChatGPT wins by technical disqualification because Bard failed to follow instructions. I asked for five recipes; Bard provided four. However, Bard did land punches. For example, it added pictures of every final dish; ChatGPT did not. That’s a big plus. ChatGPT gave me the name of the dishes in Chinese characters; Bard did not. However, given I don’t understand Chinese written characters including them was not value added.

Round 3: Bard wins by adding additional links to the story and including an explanation of what happen after the 1980 boycott. Bard offered links to U.S. State Department documents, a photo, and noted the Soviet Union retaliated in 1984 when it and its allies boycotted the Olympic games held in the USA. Impressive!

Round 4: Bard wins. Great answers were given by both competitors, however, Bard wins the round in a close decision. Bard wins, not due to substance; it wins on style points. Essentially, Bard presented the answer in a format that was superior. Bard made ample use of bullet points and subsections with titles thus making it easier for the reader to follow-along.

After four rounds we are tied. The tension mounts! The winner of round five takes home the championship belt! Hold on to your keyboard!

Round 5: In dramatic fashion ChatGPT takes round five and the title! Although Bard’s format was easier to read, ChatGPT wins using substance. ChatGPT cited two authoritative sources of information and that made the difference.

Ming, I hope you enjoyed the battle of the bots. Today’s proverb comes from Netherlands, where they say, He’s standing there with his mouth full of teeth. (He is speechless).

Until next time,

Yogi Nelson